Impacts of the US southeast wood pellet industry on local forest carbon stocks | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

European Commission Directorate General for Research and Innovation. A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection Between Economy, Society and the Environment: Updated Bioeconomy Strategy (Directorate General for Research and Innovation, 2018).

Google Scholar

Teitelbaum, L., Boldt, C. & Patermann, C. Global Bioeconomy Policy Report (IV): A Decade of Bioeconomy policy (International Advisory Council on Global Bioeconomy, 2020).

Google Scholar

European Parliament; European Council. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (2018). (Online). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/2001/oj.

European Parliament; European Council. Directive 2009/28/EC on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources (2009). (Online). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/28/oj.

Glasenapp, S., & McCusker, A. Wood energy data: the joint wood, in Wood Energy in the ECE Region: Data, Trends and Outlook in Europe, the Commonwealth of Independent States and North America, Geneva, United Nations' Economic Commission for Europe: ECE/TIM/SP/42, 1229 (2018).

Eurostat. Wood ProductsProduction and Trade (2021). (Online). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Wood_products_-_production_and_trade#Wood-based_industries. Accessed 10 9 2021.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT: Forestry Production and Trade (2021). (Online). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 13 September 2021.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (PCC Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2019).

Google Scholar

European Parliament; European Council. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807 of 13 March 2019 Supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards the Determination of High Indirect Land-Use Change-Risk (2018) (Online). fttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/807/oj.

de Oliveira Garcia, W., Amann, T. & Hartmann, J. Increasing biomass demand enlarges negative forest nutrient budget areas in wood export regions. Sci. Rep. 8, 5280 (2018).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Searchinger, T. et al. Europes renewable energy directive poised to harm global forests. Nat. Commun. 9, 3741 (2018).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Galik, C. S. & Abt, R. C. Sustainability guidelines and forest market response: An assessment of European Union pellet demand in the southeastern United States. GCB Bioenergy 8, 658669 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Favero, A. D. & Sohngen, B. Forests: Carbon sequestration, biomass energy, or both?. Sci. Adv. 6(13), eaay6792 (2020).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cowie, A. et al. Applying a science-based systems perspective to dispel misconceptions about climate effects of forest bioenergy. GCB-Bioenergy 13, 12101231 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Camia, A, Jonsson, G. J. R., Robert, N., Cazzaniga, N., Jasineviius, G., Avitabile, V., Grassi, G., Barredo, J., & Mubareka, S. The Use of Woody Biomass for Energy Production in the EU (European Commission, Joint Research Center, 2021).

Aguilar, F. X., Mirzaee, A., McGarvey, R., Shifley, S. & Burtraw, D. Expansion of US wood pellet industry points to positive trends but the need for continued monitoring. Sci. Rep. 10, 18607 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dale, V., Parish, E., Kline, K. & Tobin, E. How is wood-based pellet production affecting forest conditions in the southeastern United States?. For Ecol Manag 396, 14314 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Ceccherini, G. et al. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Nature 583, 7277 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

FORISK Consulting. U.S. Wood Bioenergy Database (2020). (Online). https://forisk.com/. Accessed 2020.

Domke, G. et al. Toward inventory-based estimates of soil organic carbon in forests of the United States. Ecol. Appl. 27(4), 12231235 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Python Org. Python Programming Language (2022) (Online). https://www.python.org/. Accessed 1 January 2018.

STATA. Stata: statistical software for data science (2022) (Online). https://www.stata.com/. Accessed 1 January 2018.

QGIS. Free and Open Source Geographic Information System (2021). (Online). https://qgis.org/en/site/.

US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Forest Inventory and Analysis National Program (2020). (Online). https://www.fia.fs.fed.us/.

Burrill, E. A., Wilson, A. M., Turner, J. A., Pugh, S. A., Menlove, J., Christiansen, G., Conkling, B., & David, W. The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and User Guide Version 8.0 for Phase 2 (US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, 2018).

Ahmed, M. et al. Spatially-explicit modeling of multi-scale drivers of aboveground forest biomass and water yield in watersheds of the Southeastern United States. J. Environ. Manag. 199, 158171 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Timilsina, N. et al. A framework for identifying carbon hotspots and forest management drivers. J. Environ. Manag. 114, 293302 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Coulston, J., Ritters, K., McRoberts, R., Reams, G. & Smith, W. True versus perturbed forest inventory plot locations for modeling: A simulation study. Can. J. For. Res. 36, 801807 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Anselin, L. Spatial effects in econometric practice in environmental and resource economics. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 83(3), 705710 (2001).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Strange-Olesen, A., Bager, S., Kittler, B., Price, W., & Aguilar, F. Environmental Implications of Increased Reliance of the EU on Biomass from the South East US (European Commission Report ENV.B.1/ETU/2014/0043, 2015).

Spelter, H., & Toth, D. North Americas Wood Pellet Sector (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, 2009).

Goerndt, M., Aguilar, F. & Skog, K. Drivers of biomass co-firing in US coal-fired power plants. Biomass Bioenerg. 58, 158167 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Forest Inventory and Analysis National Program: Timber Products Output Studies (2022). (Online). https://www.fia.fs.fed.us/program-features/tpo/. Accessed 2022.

Sonter, L. et al. Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Commun. 8(1013), 66. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00557-w (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mirzaee, A., McGarvey, R., Aguilar, F. & Schliep, E. Impact of biopower generation on eastern US forests. Environ. Dev. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02235-4 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Brandeis, C., Taylor, M., Abt, K., & Alderman, D. Status and Trends for the U.S. Forest Products Sector: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA Assessment (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Southern Research Station, Forest Inventory and Analysis, 2021).

US Environmental Protection Agency. Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) (2021) (Online). https://www.epa.gov/egrid.

US Department of Transportation. Ports: ArcGIS Online (2021) (Online). https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::ports/about.

US Census Bureau. TIGER/Line Shapefiles (2021) (Online). https://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/time-series/geo/tiger-line-file.html.

US Census Bureau. Population and Housing Units Estimates Datasets (2021) (Online). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html.

McCann, P. The Economics of Industrial Location: A Logistics-Costs Approach (Springer, 1998).

Singh, D., Cubbage, F., Gonzalez, R. & Abt, R. Locational determinants for wood pellet plants: A review and case study of North and South America. BioResources 11(3), 79287952 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Boukherroub, T., LeBel, L. & Lemieux, S. An integrated wood pellet supply chain development: Selecting among feedstock sources and a range of operating scales. Appl. Energy 198, 385400 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. & Todd, P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a JobTraining Programme. Rev. Econ. Stud. 64(4), 605654 (1997).

Article MATH Google Scholar

Caliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J. Econ. Surv. 22(1), 3172 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Woo, H., Eskelson, B. & Monleon, V. Matching methods to quantify wildfire effects on forest carbon mass in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Ecol. Appl. 31(3), e02283 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Morreale, L., Thompson, J., Tang, X., Reinmann, A. & Hutyra, L. Elevated growth and biomass along temperate forest edges. Nat. Commun. 12(7181), 66 (2021).

Google Scholar

Isard, W. The general theory of location and space-economy. Q. J. Econ. 63(4), 476506 (1949).

Article Google Scholar

Aguilar, F. X. Spatial econometric analysis of location drivers in a renewable resource-based industry: The U.S. South Lumber Industry. For. Policy Econ. 11(3), 184193 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Aguilar, F. X. Conjoint analysis of industry location preferences: evidence from the softwood lumber industry in the US. Appl. Econ. 66, 32653274 (2010).

Google Scholar

Aguilar, F. X., Goerndt, M., Song, N. & Shifley, S. Internal, external and location factors influencing cofiring of biomass with coal in the US northern region. Energy Econ. 34, 17901798 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Ferraro, P. J. et al. Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(24), 74207425 (2015).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhang, D. & Pearse, P. Forest Economics 412 (UBC Press, 2011).

Google Scholar

Villalobos, L., Coria, J. & Nordn, L. Has forest certification reduced forest degradation in Sweden?. Land Econ. 94, 220238 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Wooldridge, J. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, 2010).

Blackman, A., Corral, L., Lima, E. & Asner, G. Titling indigenous communities protects forests in the Peruvian Amazon. PNAS 114(16), 41234128 (2016).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Abt, K. L., Abt, R. C., Galik, C. S., & Skog, K. E. Effect of Policies on Pellet Production and Forests in the U.S. South: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Update of the 2010 RPA Assessment USDA (Forest Service GTR Srs-202, 2014).

Hardie, P. Parks, P. Gottleib and D. Wear, "Responsiveness of rural and urban land uses to land rent determinants in the U.S. South," Land Economics, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 659673, 2000.

Parish, E., Herzberger, A., Phifer, C. & Dale, V. Transatlantic wood pellet trade demonstrates telecoupled benefits. Ecol. Soc. 23(1), 28 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Titus, B. et al. Sustainable forest biomass: A review of current residue harvesting guidelines. Energy Sustain. Soc. 11, 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00281-w (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Jandl, R. et al. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?. Geoderma 137(3), 253268 (2007).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Nave, L., Vance, E., Swanston, C. & Cepas, P. S. Harvest impacts on soil carbon storage in temperate forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 259, 857866 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Mayer, M. et al. Tamm review: Influence of forest management activities on soil organic carbon stocks: A knowledge synthesis. For. Ecol. Manag. 466, 118127 (2020).

Read more:

Impacts of the US southeast wood pellet industry on local forest carbon stocks | Scientific Reports - Nature.com